A secretive Texas startup developing what some are calling a "game changing" energy-storage technology broke its silence this week. It announced that it has reached two production milestones and is on track to ship systems this year for use in electric vehicles.Wow. Haliburton is going to have to start a big war to prevent these batteries from making electic cars viable. What ???EEStor's ambitious goal, according to patent documents, is to "replace the electrochemical battery" in almost every application, from hybrid-electric and pure-electric vehicles to laptop computers to utility-scale electricity storage.
The company boldly claims that its system, a kind of battery-ultracapacitor hybrid based on barium-titanate powders, will dramatically outperform the best lithium-ion batteries on the market in terms of energy density, price, charge time, and safety. Pound for pound, it will also pack 10 times the punch of lead-acid batteries at half the cost and without the need for toxic materials or chemicals, according to the company.
The implications are enormous and, for many, unbelievable. Such a breakthrough has the potential to radically transform a transportation sector already flirting with an electric renaissance, improve the performance of intermittent energy sources such as wind and sun, and increase the efficiency and stability of power grids--all while fulfilling an oil-addicted America's quest for energy security.
The breakthrough could also pose a threat to next-generation lithium-ion makers such as Watertown, MA-based A123Systems, which is working on a plug-in hybrid storage system for General Motors, and Reno, NV-based Altair Nanotechnologies, a supplier to all-electric vehicle maker Phoenix Motorcars.
"I get a little skeptical when somebody thinks they've got a silver bullet for every application, because that's just not consistent with reality," says Andrew Burke, an expert on energy systems for transportation at University of California at Davis.
That said, Burke hopes to be proved wrong. "If [the] technology turns out to be better than I think, that doesn't make me sad: it makes me happy."
Richard Weir, EEStor's cofounder and chief executive, says he would prefer to keep a low profile and let the results of his company's innovation speak for themselves. "We're well on our way to doing everything we said," Weir told Technology Review in a rare interview. He has also worked as an electrical engineer at computing giant IBM and at Michigan-based automotive-systems leader TRW.
Much like capacitors, ultracapacitors store energy in an electrical field between two closely spaced conductors, or plates. When voltage is applied, an electric charge builds up on each plate.
Ultracapacitors have many advantages over traditional electrochemical batteries. Unlike batteries, "ultracaps" can completely absorb and release a charge at high rates and in a virtually endless cycle with little degradation.
Where they're weak, however, is with energy storage. Compared with lithium-ion batteries, high-end ultracapacitors on the market today store 25 times less energy per pound.
This is why ultracapacitors, with their ability to release quick jolts of electricity and to absorb this energy just as fast, are ideal today as a complement to batteries or fuel cells in electric-drive vehicles. The power burst that ultracaps provide can assist with stop-start acceleration, and the energy is more efficiently recaptured through regenerative braking--an area in which ultracap maker Maxwell Technologies has seen significant results.
if
War = High gas prices = more research into alternatives
why are we further from electric cars now than we were five years ago? Does that sound stupid? So do the last seven years.
2 comments:
Wow, thebike sure can spin an argument. I mean, I guess if thebike says Mike's a fool, then we must all BOW to the superior intellect of thebike.
What I came here to say was that I think batteries have come a long way in the past decade - NiMh rechargeables outlast NiCd by a longshot, and many applications have been able to make use of the NiMh batteries. In other small applications (i.e. flashlights), traditional batteries have been removed all together.
I'm not sure where the finish line is for electric cars, but I don't think the Iraq War has much to do with it, unfortunately. I think the consumer is more at fault than anyone.
Thanks, "thebike" A hearty greeting to your family: "themoped", "thetrike", "theunicycle" and "theelectricbike" (who says, 'hi' after you disowned him for his non-gasoline lifestyle choice.)
You don't argue: you gibber.
Government doesn't make change: it stymies or opts not to stymie developments in the world.
Expensive technologies without a means of lowering prices means that the technology will not be adopted.
Nanotechnology is not a solution but other advents (like room temperature super-conduction) could make batteries better.
Every gallon of gas contributes to terrorism. But the oil industry gets their cut, so they are defacto in collusion with terrorism. The problem is that the dependable flow of oil has given the West an economic engine. That is the real addiction.
Post a Comment