I saw that the tide was coming when I saw the XML specification for electronic paper display, I thought it was close. Then I saw the development kit. The kit itself is kind of ugly-- but imagine what the kit for first TV would have looked like. There will have to be several passes of failed experimental models in the marketplace before someone comes out with transistor radio equivalent of electronic paper: cheap, ubitiqitous and handy. To augment the power of electronic paper, gumstix computers will likely play a large role.
Where is this going? I remember the most common complaint of books on computer: they're not as handy as books. Well, what if you either take 500 sheets of electronic paper, plug the book into a USB connection and the pages are zepped with new static text. This week your book is Moby Dick; next week, it's the Art of War. What is more likely is that you will take one sheet of paper that has a bulge for a USB port and four more bubbles. Plug in the paper, the book is zapped into the electronic paper: one sheet of electronic paper. Then, the bubble buttons are for backwards and forwards movement. The problem is that model takes power to rewrite the paper. So that model will take some time.
If electronic paper can become very cheap and widespread is may give a new woe: revisionism. The progress of the DMCA and digital rights management may mean that you can only commit the official source of a document to electronic paper. When they revise the book, you can get a free revision. When they revise the material with a double-plus revision, your old version will be illegitimate; you won't be able to commit it to electronic paper. Voila! Already, people who are trying to free their own cellphones from manufacturer and reseller lockdowns are getting slapped with DMCA violations.
With the tap of some keys a futuristic Winston Smith can remake your edition. You won't keep copies you pay for on your own machine--- not when you have wide open access to the Internet and you can get the document from the source whenever you want it. They'll handle versioning for you. Before you know it, your electronic paper will have nothing but good speak.
More information
The future is no longer happening here. I have mostly wrapped up this blog.
New posts will be put on my blog and I'll fling up more on Twitter
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Monday, September 19, 2005
FAA clears way for Space Elevator testing.
From from Space.com and TechZonez
The LiftPort Group, the space elevator companies, announced September 9 that it has received a waiver from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to use airspace to conduct preliminary tests of its high altitude robotic "lifters."
The lifters are early prototypes of the technology that the company is developing for use in its commercial space elevator to ferry cargo back and forth into space.
The tests, which are planned for early fall, will simulate a working space elevator by launching a model elevator "ribbon" attached to moored balloon initially up to a mile high. The robotic lifters will then be tested in their ability to climb up and down the free-hanging ribbon, marking the first-ever test of this technology in the development of the space elevator concept.
According to Michael Laine, president of the LiftPort Group in Bremerton, Washington, the FAA go-ahead is a "critical step" in the ultimate developing of the group's LiftPort Space Elevator concept.
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Nanoshells: Using Nanotechnology To Harvest Light for Biomedicine
USING NANOTECHNOLOGY TO HARVEST LIGHT FOR BIOMEDICINE
<>Professor Naomi Halas, from Rice University in Texas, is a leader in practical applications of nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. She has received the Breast Cancer Innovator Award from the U.S. government and her research includes development of nanoshells, a new type of nanoparticle designed to selectively absorb or scatter light in a special wavelength region where light penetrates several inches into the body, making virtually all soft body tissues optically accessible. Halas will discuss these non-invasive applications and how they may change the way doctors practise medicine.
Wednesday, 14 September at 7:30 p.m.
Wednesday, 14 September at 7:30 p.m.
Matthews/McQueen Theatre, Strong Building, Room C103
Media Contacts:
Dr. Matthew Moffitt (Chemistry) at (250) 721-7162 or mmoffitt@uvic.ca
Media Contacts:
Dr. Matthew Moffitt (Chemistry) at (250) 721-7162 or mmoffitt@uvic.ca
Patty Pitts (Communications) at (250) 721-7656 or ppitts@uvic.ca
UVic media releases and other resources for journalists are available at communications.uvic.ca/media
From: uvicnews <uvicnews@uvic.ca>
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
Making Ice Without Electricity
According to SlashDot:
Time Magazine is running an article telling us how Dave Williams is trying to make ice for third-world applications using the Hilsch-Ranque vortex-tube effect (first developed in 1930 by G.J. Ranque-- then improved in 1945 by Hilsch), where swirling air is split into hot and cold components." The method is horribly inefficient but Williams is hoping it could yield helpful results in areas where electricity is really not an option."
Cooling is a small deal for people nowadays but think of what cooling can do: keep food safe; keep medicine safe; cool tired people in the third world. Also, traditional air conditioners and refridgerators have something in common: they're lousy heaters. Run a fridge and it will raise the temperature of the room a little in exchange for cooling its interior alot. All those air conditioners that run in the summertime do three things: expend electricity; dump heat; and cool rooms. It would be nice if there were a device that had the net effect of lowering the temperature.
More information is available from my new favorite source for info: the Wikipedia.
Time Magazine is running an article telling us how Dave Williams is trying to make ice for third-world applications using the Hilsch-Ranque vortex-tube effect (first developed in 1930 by G.J. Ranque-- then improved in 1945 by Hilsch), where swirling air is split into hot and cold components." The method is horribly inefficient but Williams is hoping it could yield helpful results in areas where electricity is really not an option."
Cooling is a small deal for people nowadays but think of what cooling can do: keep food safe; keep medicine safe; cool tired people in the third world. Also, traditional air conditioners and refridgerators have something in common: they're lousy heaters. Run a fridge and it will raise the temperature of the room a little in exchange for cooling its interior alot. All those air conditioners that run in the summertime do three things: expend electricity; dump heat; and cool rooms. It would be nice if there were a device that had the net effect of lowering the temperature.
More information is available from my new favorite source for info: the Wikipedia.
Tuesday, September 06, 2005
Rollable Screens
I think I would officially, like to have one of these. The Philips Concept Readius is a prototype of a connected consumer device for business professionals. The device implements a pocket-sized e-reader withouth sacrificing readability, mobility, performance, or weight.
Monday, September 05, 2005
Not Hot Air: A Cool Air Car
The people at MDI are trying to bring to market a car that runs on compressed air. MDI is a French company (Moteur Developpment International). You fill up a tank with highly compressed air, the air jets into a system of pistons that drive the engine like an internal combustion engine.
Discovery's Daily Planet highlighted the "air car". They claim it is "the world's cleanest car." The car actually emits cold air (below zero degrees celcius) as exhaust. Does that mean it will contribute to global cooling?
They are planning to release mini-cars, vans and sedans. If they could put an in-car compressor into the vehicle, I wonder if you could drive up to a gas station's air pump, fill, compress, top-up, compress, repeat? That means you could abuse the existing infrastructure. Now, that would be a swell F-U to the oil companies.
Discovery's Daily Planet highlighted the "air car". They claim it is "the world's cleanest car." The car actually emits cold air (below zero degrees celcius) as exhaust. Does that mean it will contribute to global cooling?
They are planning to release mini-cars, vans and sedans. If they could put an in-car compressor into the vehicle, I wonder if you could drive up to a gas station's air pump, fill, compress, top-up, compress, repeat? That means you could abuse the existing infrastructure. Now, that would be a swell F-U to the oil companies.
Friday, September 02, 2005
The Singularity
I love concepts that tie into the viridian future that we're a part of. But what is progress without the move forward: smaller, cheaper, faster, better. What if our headlong technological charge meant that wind power, fuel cells, wifi and rest of it were just a phase. What if this stuff had the longevity of the 8-track? What if the approach of nanotech and super computing gave us "the singularity"? We're on one side of the singularity, approaching a crazy technological future. The singularity makes everything possible: open ended longevity, intelligent computer, space travel-- the works. Well, that's the theory. Part of the concept of singularity is that which lies beyond cannot be imagined. It would be like Shakespeare writing a Java applet.
This is a cool think piece on the concept of "Singularity.":
The quote I like best:
Speed != better wiring is a good concept to remember. After all, there are 3.2 Ghz machines out people's desktops. In 1994 when PCs cracked 100 Mhz (0.1 Ghz), did people think that machines with 32x the speed would still jam up? Or, did they think they would be translating foreign languages in real time? We give money to Wintel for their faster machines. Why not wait for a better machine? Mac's move away from Motorola to Intel will only speed this rut. We are in the latter era of Moore's Law where new chips have to be very fast and are very costly to R&D. That means that AMD, Intel, Motorola and a small list of others have to be careful with what they release. If someone comes out with "self aware" architecture or architecture that could allow for a self-aware machine, they will have to justify it to the masses who only wanted the next version of Word.
That architectural jump has be made. When you want to do some hammering, you buy a hammer. When you want to build a pulley, sure you could build one using hammer in some way, but it isn't really going to work. To make a self aware machine, we have to abandon the x86 architecture, or relegate it to some backward task.
The thought I've had for an SF story is the idea of a "bloom." A chunklet of code that, when it's executed, it causing a cascade of von-Neumann style code writing to make the executing machine self-aware. The problem is the simplicity of neural nets/chaos in nature versus the complexity in computer science. If you throw a bunch of water onto a dirt field-- so much so that you get canals and rivulets of water-- the pattern of those courses has a determinism. Reproduce the experiment and you will find similar results in successive experiments. If you could throw that same easy ability to go left or right into a path of code execution, you could get this going on. The problem: it isn't that easy. Maybe it is just that easy.
Other stuff on The Singularity. The best part: an exchange that paints a TV reporter as retarded.
This is a cool think piece on the concept of "Singularity.":
The quote I like best:
"It's hard to say precisely what "strong superhumanity" would be like, but the difference appears to be profound. Imagine running a dog mind at very high speed. Would a thousand years of doggy living add up to any human insight?"
Speed != better wiring is a good concept to remember. After all, there are 3.2 Ghz machines out people's desktops. In 1994 when PCs cracked 100 Mhz (0.1 Ghz), did people think that machines with 32x the speed would still jam up? Or, did they think they would be translating foreign languages in real time? We give money to Wintel for their faster machines. Why not wait for a better machine? Mac's move away from Motorola to Intel will only speed this rut. We are in the latter era of Moore's Law where new chips have to be very fast and are very costly to R&D. That means that AMD, Intel, Motorola and a small list of others have to be careful with what they release. If someone comes out with "self aware" architecture or architecture that could allow for a self-aware machine, they will have to justify it to the masses who only wanted the next version of Word.
That architectural jump has be made. When you want to do some hammering, you buy a hammer. When you want to build a pulley, sure you could build one using hammer in some way, but it isn't really going to work. To make a self aware machine, we have to abandon the x86 architecture, or relegate it to some backward task.
The thought I've had for an SF story is the idea of a "bloom." A chunklet of code that, when it's executed, it causing a cascade of von-Neumann style code writing to make the executing machine self-aware. The problem is the simplicity of neural nets/chaos in nature versus the complexity in computer science. If you throw a bunch of water onto a dirt field-- so much so that you get canals and rivulets of water-- the pattern of those courses has a determinism. Reproduce the experiment and you will find similar results in successive experiments. If you could throw that same easy ability to go left or right into a path of code execution, you could get this going on. The problem: it isn't that easy. Maybe it is just that easy.
Other stuff on The Singularity. The best part: an exchange that paints a TV reporter as retarded.
Thursday, September 01, 2005
Nanotech: Boffins build cancer-spotting nanobelts
This from the Register:
Research scientists at Georgia Tech have built nano-scale detectors so sensitive that they will be capable of spotting individual cancer cells.
The detectors are based on a new kind of quasi-one dimensional nano material, dubbed nanobelts or nanoribbons, which can be made from a variety of materials, like zinc or tin oxides. They are typically between 30nm and 300nm wide, and can be a few millimetres long.
The semiconducting nanobelts, first synthesised in 2001, can be tuned to exhibit certain behaviours. Introducing oxygen vacancies can affect their conductivity, surface and optical properties.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)